The PCB Design Magazine


Issue link:

Contents of this Issue


Page 41 of 64

42 The PCB Design Magazine • February 2014 Editor's Note: This column also appears in this month's issue of The PCB Magazine. CAM vs. Capability Many new customers have some miscon- ceptions about what a typical fab shop can and cannot do. There are levels of manufacturing that need to be well understood by the buyer. The PCB buyer needs to know where a board will be a good fit based on the parts' complexity. How does this happen? How does the PCB buy- er or a contract manufacturer know who is (or is not) a good fit based on a myriad of different designs, from simple 2–4 layer RF parts to high- layer count HDI, blind and buried via parts? If the part is of medium complexity, it can be built by virtually any mid to higher level PCB fabricator. Many times it boils down to things like quote response time. More diligent buyers may use a tool such as The PCB List where they can compare technology levels side-by-side and make good decisions about where a part should go. Not all PCB buyers need a shop that can do 2 mil lines and spaces or laser stacked vias. Sometimes the product dictates a shop of this type must be used; other times, when a given design does not "push" the fabricator's limits, more fabricators obviously have an opportunity to show what they can do. What is CAM? Not all board fabricators have the ability to have both CAD and CAM. You may say to your- self, "But a CAM tool should be able to do some, if not all, CAD functions." And that is true. But if you are really getting to the design level, you need to have a design team. Many PCB fabrica- tors do not have design capabilities but do have the ability to understand the customers' needs and recognize design attributes. Let me give you some examples of this, rang- ing from simple CAM assumptions to more com- plex ones. Let's say a design has copper poured right to the edge of the part, but is NOT a Z-axis or edge-plated part. A good CAM department may do a very minimal clip of the metal around the periphery like .003–.004". This is imper- ceptible to the end-user as it appears metal is right to the edge and if the metal would have been left alone there may be burring at final rout (functional, but not cosmetically the best ). Again, this is where a good CAM person comes into play: When would they NOT do some- thing like a minimal clip for rout? An example by Mark Thompson CID+ PROTOTROn CiRCuiTS THE BARE (BoARD) TRUTH Understanding the Typical CAM Process column

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of The PCB Design Magazine - PCBD-Feb2014