PCB007 Magazine

PCB-Apr2014

Issue link: http://iconnect007.uberflip.com/i/291105

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 77 of 90

78 The PCB Magazine • April 2014 by Todd Kolmodin gardien serVices usa A Summary of Various Test Requirements c o l u m n testiNg todd IPC Class 3 The PCB industry has advanced signifi- cantly in the recent millennium. OEM specifi- cations and requirements have also advanced due to the maturing of technologies, which has caused the requirements of electrical test of these higher technology products to advance and increase in intensity. Obviously, the more mature a technology, the finer the lines and spaces must be, the more hole and vias must be present, and the more complex the testing must become. There is just more to test in a smaller amount of space. Long gone are the "pin-in-hole" technol- ogy PCBs, which are now surpassed by the large multilayer, blind/buried and rigid-flex technol- ogies. For the suppliers of electrical test, be it in- house test departments or sub-contracted, the industry specifications can be confusing, and at times incomprehensible. The OEMs direct the IPC specification (6012, 9252A, AS9100, etc.) for their fabrication to the manufacturer, but in many cases do the OEMs or CMs really know what they are asking for? Do they really understand what they are requir- ing and how complicated it may be? There are many variables associated with these specifications and requirements to their designated classes regarding electrical test. OEMs often overlook the electrical properties associated with IPC class performance require- ment, and of course, this can be a problem. Manufacturing, plating, etching and all those processes may be within the class requirements. During the coming months, I will discuss various aspects and intricacies of electrical test. To get started, I will address IPC class 1, 2, and 3. Class I: General Electronic Products This class includes consumer products, some computer products and computer peripherals suitable for applications where cosmetic imper- fections are not important, and the major re- quirement is function of the completed board.

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of PCB007 Magazine - PCB-Apr2014