PCB007 Magazine


Issue link: http://iconnect007.uberflip.com/i/306762

Contents of this Issue


Page 67 of 72

68 The PCB Magazine • May 2014 Reader: Is one type of test better than an- other? why? todd: What it comes down to is the product itself: What is it designed to do and what pre- cautions and life cycle does the OEM expect? I cannot speak for other service organizations, but with my group we are going to test the product as if it were going to keep us alive, keep our kids online with school and keep us informed when we need to be. There are minimums that PCBs need to be tested. The informational database with OEMs goes back years; notes and such just get re-pasted into new prints. My group contin - ues to work strongly with these OEMs to make sure their product is tested to the most updated parameters. Reader: what are the different types of electrical test that you can perform on a circuit board, and which is best for my product? todd: Let's start with flying probe testing. Flying probe direct will test the PCB 100% in resistive mode and isolation test 100% based on an adjacency window. (Industry standard .050.) Flying probe indirect will do a capacitive gather and full resistive test of first board; subsequent boards will receive capacitive gather and be compared to master. Possible faults will receive full resistive retest. Flying probe is just another tool today for the test bureaus. Flying probe can test product without the use of the historic bed of nails fix- ture. There are tradeoffs though. Indirect test- ing with signature analysis does allow faster testing but does not subject the PCB to full re- sistive test. However, this is allowed under the IPC for Class I and II. On a Class III board it is allowed, but only after an agreement between the OEM and manufacturer, which is the hard part for service bureaus. This communication conduit does not exist for most. Many OEMs just expect their boards to be electrically test - ed but do not have any idea what options are available. When presented with the quandary they will opt for fixture test as that is historic. Unfortunately, fixture test also increases the price for their product, often without the OEM knowing why. Reader: what is bed-of-nails testing and when is it used? todd: Bed-of-nails testing is the old-school test, and it is also stipulated as a requirement for a lot of military product. This is the "fixture" test. This is an apparatus that probes directly at all points necessary, simultaneously. These are large, costly machines that were the beginning of the solution of electrical test. Reader: what is hi-pot testing and when is it used? todd: Hi-pot is a test used to verify that the dielectrics in the board are sound or that the power and ground layers are isolated. With the thin cores used today it has become imperative that these isolations are met or the PCB can fail in its duty cycle. 007: what is netlist testing and when is it used? todd: Netlist testing is the process where the electrical test equipment tests the product against a known good signature. What this means is that the electrical test machine already knows what to expect from the PCB. Years ago it was self-learn and compare. Today, the ma- chines already know what to expect from the product based on the design data and will ref- eree accordingly. In an upcoming column, I will discuss what the future of e-testing will look like and I will elaborate on subjects such as testing requirements for embedded components, high resolution mea- surements, and Kelvin high-resolution testing. Questions are encouraged and will be ad- dressed in future columns. PCB todd Kolmodin is the vice president of quality for Gar- dien services usa, and an expert in electrical test and reliability issues. His new column, Testing Todd, now appears monthly in The PCB Magazine. to contact Kolmodin, click here. TESTING: EVERYTHING YOU WANTED TO KNOW, BUT WERE AFRAID TO ASK continues

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of PCB007 Magazine - PCB-May2014