SMT Magazine

SMT-Sept2017

Issue link: http://iconnect007.uberflip.com/i/869081

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 33 of 105

34 SMT Magazine • September 2017 Bake Out after Cleaning? After cleaning of the reworked PCBs, the boards may need to be baked out. The vast ma- jority of assemblies cleaned in an aqueous pro- cess, with or without cleaning materials beyond water alone, are dried but not baked out. A small percentage of printed circuit board assem- blies seeing water in their cleaning process are followed by an oven-type extended bake out. If a bake is required, then a 2- to 4-hour bake at 105°C or an 8- to 24-hour bake at 65°C is ade- quate for typical FR-4 type assemblies. The need for a bake out is also a function of the type of drying system found in your clean- er. If your cleaner utilizes an airknife to blow off the water from the assemblies, then your chanc- es of requiring a bake process are increased, es- pecially with multilayer boards. Airknife drying systems are most commonly found as part of inline cleaning systems. If your cleaner utilizes a convection/radiant forced heat type technol- ogy to dry the assemblies, then there's no need for bake out. The answer to the question of whether a bake is required after rework and re-washing of a PCB is "it depends." SMT References 1. IPC-1601 Printed Circuit Board Handling and Storage Guidelines. Bob Wettermann is the principal of BEST Inc., a contract rework and repair facility in Chicago. DRYING BOARDS AFTER REWORK CLEANING—TO DO OR NOT TO DO? An international team by Nagoya University has developed a new way of controlling the do- main structure of ferroelectric materials, which could accelerate development of future electron- ic and electro-mechanical devices. "We grew lead zirconate titanate films on dif- ferent substrate types to induce different kinds of physical strain, and then selectively etched parts of the films to create nanorods," says lead author Tomoaki Yamada. "The domain structure of the nanorods was almost completely flipped com- pared with [that of] the thin film." Lead zirconate titanate is a common type of ferroelectric material, which switches based on the movement of trapped lead atoms between two stable positions in the crystal lattice. Parts of the film were deliberately removed to leave free - standing rods on the substrates. The team then used synchrotron X-ray radiation to probe the domain structure of individual rods. The contact area of the rods with the sub- strate was greatly reduced and the domain prop- erties were influenced more by the surrounding environment, which mixed up the domain struc- ture. The team found that coating the rods with a metal could screen the effects of the air and they tended to recover the original domain struc- ture, as determined by the substrate. "There are few effective ways of manipulating the domain structure of ferroelectric materials, and this becomes more difficult when the mate- rial is nanostructured and the contact area with the substrate is small," says collaborator Nava Setter. "We have learned that it's possible to nanostructure these materials with control over their domains, which is an essential step towards the new functional nanoscale devices promised by these materials." Nagoya-led Team Flips the Switch on Ferroelectrics

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of SMT Magazine - SMT-Sept2017