PCB007 Magazine

PCB007-Sept2020

Issue link: https://iconnect007.uberflip.com/i/1288481

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 120 of 137

SEPTEMBER 2020 I PCB007 MAGAZINE 121 pened. We built these boards, and every one of the reds failed reflow testing. Three of them passed. Therefore, as seen in Figure 15, we had a void in the microvia at the cap plating. The one on the bottom right passed. When you build them right, they pass; but if you have problems, they will fail. This is a real case study (Figure 16). I had a new CAM planner that planned for a 5-mil mi- crovia; because of the price at five, it is a five- mil laser via, and the aspect ratio was high. I highly recommend 0.75:1.0. Figure 17 shows the test cycle at 245°C. The black line is the actual temperature on the cou- pon. Here is what happened during the rou- tine first reflow. It looked like it was okay, but then we started having failures at the second reflow, and it happened more and more as we got down to the sixth reflow cycle (Figure 18). Figure 15: Example of WMI failure caught by OM testing. Figure 16: A microvia at 0.005" with an aspect ratio of 1:1 and a dielectric target of 0.0045". Figure 17: OM thermal cycling on the actual D-Coupons.

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of PCB007 Magazine - PCB007-Sept2020