SMT007 Magazine

SMT007-Oct2025

Issue link: https://iconnect007.uberflip.com/i/1539960

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 51 of 81

52 SMT007 MAGAZINE I OCTOBER 2025 cal reliability, particularly in mission-critical systems such as avionics, military processors, and automo- tive controllers. The Need for BGA Reballing There are several reasons BGAs require reballing during manufacturing or refurbishment: 1. Conversion of solder alloys: Many defense and aerospace applications mandate SnPb finishes for reliability, requiring conversion from standard lead-free solder. 2. Refurbishment and repair: Reballing extends the service life of expensive components that would otherwise be scrapped. 3. Rework for quality assurance: Damaged or contaminated solder balls discovered during incoming inspection can be replaced via reballing The Reballing Process Selecting a Reballing Service Provider When outsourcing reballing, buyers and engineers should look for compliance with IPC J-STD-001, IPC- 7711, GEIA-STD-0006, and IEC TS 62647-4 stan- dards. Critical capability ranges to verify include: • Package sizes from 3 × 3 mm to 60 × 60 mm • Pitch from 0.20 mm to 1.5 mm • Ball diameters from 8 mil to 35 mil • Methods supported: fixture-based reballing and preform/stencil systems Thorough post-process inspection is non- negotiable. Providers should be equipped for coplanarity checks, ball volume measurement, debris detection, and short/open analysis. Risks Associated With BGA Reballing While reballing is an effective method for extending the usability of BGA components, it carries several inherent risks if not per- formed under tightly controlled conditions. Excessive heat during deballing or reflow can lead to pad delamination, lifted pads, or substrate warpage, all of which may render the device unusable. Inadequate cleaning between processes increases the likelihood of residual flux entrapment or ionic contami- nation, which can compromise long-term reliability and cause electrochemical migration. Misalignment of solder balls or uneven solder distribution may result in coplanarity issues, bridg- ing, or head-in-pillow defects that are difficult to detect without advanced X-ray inspection. Addi- tionally, repeated thermal exposure during multiple rework cycles can degrade the component's metal- lization and reduce its overall mechanical strength. For these reasons, BGA reballing should only be performed by trained technicians using controlled equipment, validated processes, and compre- hensive inspection protocols to minimize risk and ensure compliance with IPC and industry standards. Best Practices for Mitigating Reballing Risks • Thermal management: Use tightly controlled reflow profiles to avoid overheating that can cause pad delamination, lifted pads, or sub- strate warpage • Process cleanliness: Ensure thorough clean- ing between deballing and reballing steps to eliminate flux residues and prevent ionic contamination • Precise ball placement: Use fixtures, sten- cils, or preforms to guarantee accurate align- ment and uniform solder distribution • Inspection protocols: Perform both visual and X-ray inspection per IPC-A-610 and IPC- 7095 standards to detect coplanarity issues, solder bridging, voids, or hidden defects K N O C K I N G D OW N T H E B O N E P I L E ▼ F i x t u re - b a s e d re b a l l i n g p ro c e s s .

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of SMT007 Magazine - SMT007-Oct2025