PCB007 Magazine


Issue link: https://iconnect007.uberflip.com/i/521718

Contents of this Issue


Page 67 of 90

68 The PCB Magazine • June 2015 Although flex circuits are nothing new in today's technology roadmap, the testing of un- populated flexible circuits can be challenging. These circuits can be very thin, have challeng- ing geometrical configurations and in some cases be a combination of rigid bare board and flex. There are basically three different methods available to test these challenging circuits: man- ual, fixture and flying probe. Manual Test Manual testing simply involves a digital volt meter (DVM) where the circuits are "rang out" by testing the continuity (opens) and disconti- nuity (shorts) of the individual nets. However many semi-affordable DVMs can only provide continuity measurements true to the IPC and MIL specifications as the resistance resolution for discontinuity (shorts) testing cannot test to the isolation requirements of the specifications. Fixture Test Flex circuits, in many cases, can be tested by the use of both dedicated (wired) and uni- versal grid (pinned) fixtures. Both of these fix- tures are desired when high volume is manufac- tured. However, the challenge is registering the product to the actual fixture. Some, but not all, flex circuits have mounting holes that can be used to register the circuit to the fixture, which makes the use of fixtures optimal for high vol- ume. Unfortunately, mounting holes may be non-plated and the repeatability of registration may be compromised. In other cases, there may be no mounting holes at all as the flex circuit is "clamped" to a connector, making fixture reg- istration difficult. To overcome the challenge, "dams" or registration barriers may be designed into the fixtures so that the flex circuit may still repeatedly register to the fixture. This can be extremely difficult as many current flex circuits have extremely tight designs and very small landing pads (lans.) Mis-registration on these very small pads can result in "mouse biting" or full destruction of the pad itself, resulting in scrap. Flying Probe Test This method can be the most advantageous option for testing low to medium volumes. The first advantage is of course cost. The fixture is eliminated as well as the time taken to build it. With only front-end programming required, this is an excellent option for prototypes and by Todd Kolmodin GarDIEn SErVIcES uSa testing todd Flex and Rigid-Flex Circuit Testing: Challenges & Solutions FeAtuRe Column Figure 1: Standard DVM probe test. Figure 2: Fixture with dams.

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of PCB007 Magazine - PCB-June2015