PCB007 Magazine

PCB-Jun2017

Issue link: https://iconnect007.uberflip.com/i/834021

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 55 of 103

56 The PCB Magazine • June 2017 per-fine things, and we're competing. The prob- lem we see in the marketplace with getting cop- per foils is that the lead times are starting to lengthen and what our suppliers tell us is that fine line etching is really using up the thinner material. But even more so, these energy storage bat- teries, not just for cars but for homes, for stor- ing solar energy or whatever energy require a lot of copper. They're sucking up all the cop- per in the industry and now we're seeing lead times out 6−8 weeks where before it was a cou- ple of weeks. The lead times are going up at the same time that our volumes are going up. I don't know where that's going to end, but every time Tesla builds a new megaplant somewhere, believe me, they're going to use a lot more cop- per. I don't have an answer to that question ex- cept that so far, we're dealing with it and we're keeping up with the demand. We'll see how that goes. Matties: What sort of increase in copper price do you expect we'll see this year, 30%? Brandler: I have no idea. What we've seen so far is an increase in delivery and the lead time is being pushed out. But you're asking the wrong guy, I'm the technical guy. I don't really get in- volved in economics but you asked the right question. I think it's inevitable that's going to happen. But the lead times being pushed out tells me they're struggling with capacity issues which means the price is going to start climb- ing. Matties: Thank you very much. Happy, do you have any thoughts or questions on this? Happy Holden: Well, it's an interesting top- ic that's been around a long time. One of the problems I always felt with the material suppli- er is that they always had the cart in front of the horse. In other words, they were always intro- ducing and pushing new and better materials but had failed to establish any kind of cost trad- eoff. The first step is always providing some cost trade off. In other words, everybody asks how much is this going to save us or what benefit is this? And since they never really produced any kind of model or software to allow people to do a cost tradeoff, those that experiment with it got burned severely when they found out how expensive it was versus conventional surface mount and even embedded surface mount. So the industry still has the fundamental problem with the question of "how do I ben- efit from this?" There are some companies like in the aerospace industry, because of reliabili- ty and temperature and/or size or weight, they have to use that and they've been a user for 35 years. The mobile phone people are using it for the same reason and that is size and weight as well as performance advantage. But that's not the North American market too much or the rest of the world. Everybody is still stand- ing around waiting and saying, "Show me the benefits." And I don't mean a whole bunch of bullets about how great it is, because we know that's only part of the picture. Show me the cost model. Prof. Peter Sandborn at the University of Maryland developed software for MCC and Savantage Inc. that does cost tradeoffs of em- bedding components, either discreet or pro- cess. And it does it iteratively as it redesigns the board to find the sweet spot, where if you do it this way, you have this many resistors or this many capacitors or this size, you can reduce the size so that the material cost drops and you'll make money. But that's not available, or no- body's commercialized that or made it available for free. We're all still stuck with that first ques- tion. Then comes the second question: What are the characteristics available of the material? Then comes, how do I design this, what are the design tools out there, and how do I use them? The fourth question is, how do I fabricate this? Is it a drop-in, or do you have to add special processes and things like that? I've put embedded ICs into active produc- tion and shipped tens of millions of the units. The fabrication of some of these things is a lot more difficult than many times what's adver- tised, especially if you're doing active ICs not just passive devices. He still actively uses that software, which means an article by him or him describing the software, since most people don't know it exists, might inspire others to produce a spreadsheet or base thing that we can have on A DEEP LOOK INTO EMBEDDED TECHNOLOGY

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of PCB007 Magazine - PCB-Jun2017