SMT007 Magazine

SMT-Feb2015

Issue link: https://iconnect007.uberflip.com/i/455818

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 53 of 110

54 SMT Magazine • February 2015 failure [9] . Figure 2 depicts an acrylic conformal coating that does not completely encapsulate the lead wires of a quad-flat package. To address this issue, the IPC 5-22ARR J-STD-001/Confor- mal Coating Material and Application Indus- try Assessment Task Group has conducted a round-robin study to characterize the coverage provided by commonly used conformal coating materials with existing application processes. The study includes 26 different material combi- nations, and the results are expected to be used for updating measurement and evaluation stan- dards. In designing safety and control electronics, the risks of using tin must be carefully assessed. To this end, methods for assessing failure risk have been developed [6] . For example, the risk of a tin whisker–induced short can be estimated by identifying tin-finished surfaces, distances from the identified surface to surfaces at a different electrical potential, and knowledge of whisker growth statistics. Tin whisker lengths can vary dramatically; however, they have been found to follow a lognormal distribution [7] . The den- sity of whisker growth can also vary dramati- cally. For assessment, software [8] using measured whisker growth statistics has been published in the open literature. With these methods, a probability of failure can be assigned to the tin whisker failures, and the effect of tin whisker failure mitigation strategies that rely on separa- tion and coating coverage can be assessed. Thus far, the ban on the use of lead in most electronics has not resulted in public concern about tin whiskers. This result is likely is due in large part to the development of industry standards, research by industry and academic groups, engineering functions within organiza- tions to address this reliability threat, as well as closed discussion related to product failures, in general. However, this does not mean the risk to electronics posed by tin whiskers has been eliminated. Research into whisker mitigation strategies and the tests for assessing whisker risk should continue to be supported. As long as the electronic industry continues to use tin, tin whisker risk must be addressed. Tin whiskers are a known problem, and forgetting to account for their potential failure risk will cost organiza- tions dearly. SMT references 1. B. Sood, M. Osterman and M. Pecht, "Tin Whisker Analysis of Toyota's Electronic Throt- tle Controls," Circuit World, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 4–9, 2011. 2. Leidecker, Panashchenko, and Brusse, Electrical Failure of an Accelerator Pedal Posi- tion Sensor Caused by Tin Whiskers, 5th Inter- national Symposium on Tin Whiskers, College Park, Maryland, 2011. 3. Tadahiro Shibutani, Michael Osterman, and Michael Pecht, Standards for Tin Whisker Test Methods on Lead-Free Components. IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 216–219, Mar. 2009. 4. S. Han, M. Osterman, M. Pecht, "Like- lihood of Metal Vapor Arc by Tin Whiskers," IMAPS Advanced Technology Workshop on High Reliability Microelectronics for Military Applications, Linthicum Heights, MD, May 17– 19, 2011. 5. P. Vianco, M. Neilsen, J. Rejent, and R. Grant, Validation of the Dynamic Recrystalliza- tion (DRX) Mechanism for Whisker and Hillock Growth on Thin Films, 8 th International Sympo- sium on Tin Whiskers, Raleigh, NC, October 2014 6. Tong Fang, Michael Osterman, Sony Mathew, and Michael Pecht, Tin Whisker Risk Assessment, Circuit World, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp 25–29, May 2006. 7. T. Fang, M. Osterman, and M. Pecht, Sta- tistical Analysis of Tin Whisker Growth, Micro- electronics Reliability, Vol. 46, Issues 5–6, pp. 846–849, May–June, 2006. 8. CalceTinWhiskerRiskCalculator, pub- lished by CALCE, 2005. 9. Sungwon Han, Stephan Meschter, Mi- chael Osterman and Michael Pecht, Evaluation of Effectiveness of Conformal Coatings as Tin Whisker Mitigation, Journal of Electronic Mate- rials, Vol. 41, Issue 9, pp 2508–2518, July 2012. Michael osterman is a research scientist at university of Maryland, center for advanced life cycle engineering. Feature TIN WHISKerS reMaIN a CONCerN continues

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of SMT007 Magazine - SMT-Feb2015