SMT007 Magazine

SMT-Aug2017

Issue link: https://iconnect007.uberflip.com/i/855901

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 29 of 87

30 SMT Magazine • August 2017 you paid for it, or is it a lot more based on the 1s and 0s you have added to the hard drive or the cloud? What value do you declare for your com- puter when going through customs? Will the issue of the price we pay for elec- tronic components become moot and evapo- rate when we are able to create components or assembled products by simply printing them in our office? Will the human machine inter- face (HMI) for the pick-and-place machine be- come considerably less expensive when we will be able to directly program and control the ma- chine with our brain? Will we even need a pick- and-place machine to assemble an electronic product? Hey, what do YOU say? I'd like to hear your thoughts, reactions and opinions. We'll wrap up our discussion on materi- al pricing next month with input from people close to the uncontrollable material cost vari- ables we have discussed in this column. SMT References 1. T. Borkes, "Electronic Product Assembly in the Global Marketplace: The Material Piece of the Competitive Puzzle," SMTA Internation- al Conference Proceedings, Orlando, Fl., Octo- ber 2010. 2. T. Borkes, "Reading, Writing, Listening, Speaking and Analyzing the Cost of Material in Today's Global Economy, Part 1," SMT Maga- zine, June 2017. 3. T. Borkes, "Analyzing the Cost of Material in Today's Global Economy, Part 2," SMT Maga- zine, July 2017. 4. T. Borkes, "Electronic Product Assembly in the Global Marketplace: The Material Piece of the Competitive Puzzle," SMTA Internation- al Conference Proceedings, Orlando, Fl., Octo- ber 2010. 5. N. Negroponte, Being Digital, Alfred A. Knopf, 1995. Tom Borkes is the founder of the Jefferson Project and the forthcom- ing Jefferson Institute of Technolo- gy. To read past columns or to con- tact Borkes, click here. ANALYZING THE COST OF MATERIAL IN TODAY'S GLOBAL ECONOMY, PART 3 I-Connect007 Survey on Process Step Elimination: Percentage of Total Cycle Time Spent on Final Inspection Around half of the respondents answered they only spend gen- erally between 1% and 5% of their total cycle time doing final inspection of their products. On the other hand, about 30% of the respondents said almost up to 15% of their total cycle time is spent doing inspection, while 10% of the surveyed manufacturers even said they spend even longer time than that when it comes to final inspection.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of SMT007 Magazine - SMT-Aug2017